Independent · Physician-led · Evidence first
Metabolic medicine, explained honestly.
Clear, sourced education on GLP-1 and next-generation obesity therapies. No sales. No sponsors. No hype.
Calculator preview · all three medications, 100 kg start
Markers are the published measurements. Straight lines between markers — and the dashed segment from baseline — are visual connectors, not measured trajectories. Studies ran for different durations (Semaglutide 68 wk, Tirzepatide 72 wk, Retatrutide 48 wk), used different doses and populations, and are not head-to-head — do not read this as a direct efficacy ranking.
| Study | Week | Treatment avg (kg) | Change | Placebo avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide | 68 | 85.1 | -14.9% | 97.6 |
| Tirzepatide | 72 | 79.1 | -20.9% | 96.9 |
| Retatrutide | 24 | 82.5 | -17.5% | 98.4 |
| Retatrutide | 48 | 75.8 | -24.2% | 97.9 |
Compare
The medications
Semaglutide
Approved for chronic weight management.
FDA-approvedTirzepatide
Approved for chronic weight management.
InvestigationalRetatrutide
Not FDA-approved as of the October 2026 content review.
Separate studies are never head-to-head comparisons.
Latest research
Retatrutide phase 2: what the 2023 NEJM trial did and didn't show
A plain-language reading of the 48-week phase 2 obesity trial of an investigational triple-hormone receptor agonist.
Reviewed 2026-10-11
How to read weight-loss trial numbers without being misled
Means, placebo adjustment, estimands, and why a trial average is not your personal forecast.
Reviewed 2026-10-11
New evidence, in your inbox
A physician-reviewed digest when meaningful research lands. Email only.
Content review 2026-10-11